The objective of live application security testing is to expose flaws in online applications as they are being used. Static application security testing is performed on an application before it goes into production, while dynamic application security testing is done on live systems.
It is not necessary to have access to the application’s source code in order to perform static analysis.
Many organizations, such as banking and financial services, telecom, and e-commerce, use both static and dynamic application security testing methods to find as many vulnerabilities as possible.
SQL injection, command injection, Cross-site scripting (XSS), and other assaults are all examples of this kind of vulnerability.
In this post, we’ll look at the best tools for dynamic application security testing and compare them to one another.
The practice of performing dynamic application security testing is the process of finding web application flaws while they’re in use.
In contrast to static application security testing, it does not require the source code of the program. It’s a form of black-box testing.
Both static and dynamic application security testing tools are used by several organizations, such as banking and financial services, telecom marketplace, and e-commerce.
SQL injection, Cross-site scripting (XSS), command injection, and other types of attacks are just a few examples of vulnerabilities.
The main features of dynamic application security testing include:
Astra’s Pentest is a widely used tool for dynamic application security testing. It has many features and can scan a variety of applications.
Burp Suite is a popular software for dynamic application security testing that is easy to use with a wide variety of features.
AppScan is a popular tool for dynamic application security testing. It provides a wealth of functions and may scan a variety of applications.
Netsparker is an up-and-coming tool for dynamic application security testing that offers some unique features.
HP WebInspect is another popular tool for dynamic application security testing. It is easy to use and has a wide range of features.
AppSpider is a tool from WhiteHat Security that offers some unique features for dynamic application security testing.
Web Application Attack and Audit Framework (WAAAF) is an open-source framework for performing dynamic application security testing.
The Samurai Web Testing Framework is a popular open-source toolkit for web penetration testing.
proxy is a proxy designed specifically for auditing web applications.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is another popular open-source toolkit for web pen testing.
These tools are some of the best tools available out there for dynamic application security testing. When these dynamic application security testing tools are compared, every tool has its own nuances and features. Organizations are encouraged to pick and choose a tool for dynamic application security testing after carefully assessing and deciding on their security needs.
Each organization will have different needs when it comes to dynamic application security testing. There is no ideal single solution. It is important to carefully assess the needs of your organization and then pick the tool that best suits those needs.
The pros and cons of dynamic application security testing are as follows:
Pros:
Cons:
The pros of Dynamic Application Security Testing definitely outweigh the cons in most cases, which makes it an important part of any organization’s overall security strategy.
However, as with any form of assessment or testing, it is important to understand what exactly will be tested and how that information will be used before starting the process.
An organization can make an informed decision about whether or not dynamic application security testing is appropriate for them if they understand the advantages and disadvantages of this form of testing.